Weblog

Monday, 10 November 2008

  • The Pursuit of God - Review

    This entry was originally published at GlobalYawning.com

    On some level, it is foolish to attempt to pen a review of Tozer’s The Pursuit of God, since I’ve already spent thousands of words covering just a few chapters.  If you’d like to peruse those thoughts, you’ll find them here.  But ignoring the obvious, I’ll attempt to cover a concise review that will just be a wordier version of “You should read this book.”

    So… you should read this book.  But as to why, I think Tozer says it the best in his description of the book, “A modest attempt to aid God’s hungry children to find Him.”  In one sense this book serves as a practical guide, a road map of sorts, for communion with God.  And yet, it is so much more, primarily because I do not believe Tozer would be content with recommending a three or 10 or 12 or however many step plan in connecting with God.  It is not a math problem, but a dance, and Tozer is one of the best dance instructors on the block.  Even this is a misrepresentation, though, because much as with dancing where one partner leads and the other follows, God is continually directing our path.  As such, Tozer’s insight is the obvious (though rarely easy) admonition - follow Him.  Practice hearing His method of communication, and go as He leads.

    In speaking on pride, Tozer penned the following: “A whole world of literature has been created to justify this kind of life [pride, self-importance] as the only normal one.  And this is the more to be wondered at seeing that these are the evils which make life the bitter struggle it is for all of us.  All our heartaches and a great many of our physical ills spring directly out of our sins.” (110)  We only get our toes crushed when we are out of step with our dance partner.  Tozer is a man that understands man, and with that, he grasps man’s self-destructive tendencies, while also realizing that man longs for His Creator.  It is in walking this balance that Tozer merges the head and the heart in, well, in pursuit of God.

    This book is short, inexpensive (you can easily find it free online if you can stand reading long passages on the screen, or have an ereader), and spirit-filled.  If you’re still on the fence, please read some of my other pieces of this book.  If after all that, you still decide not to pick up this book… I’ll pray for you!

Thursday, 06 November 2008

  • Please Forgive The Unclever Title

    This entry was originally published at GlobalYawning.com

    This post is inspired by a great discussion at Flood’s PB community group this week.  The topic of the night was the sixth commandment, honor your mother and your father, but the most interesting part of the discussion was on forgiveness in general.

    We began talking about some incredible offenses people could carry out against us, specifically murdering of a loved one, or sexual abuse of a child.  The idea of forgiving such an offense is, in my mind, even difficult to fathom.*  Perhaps unsurprisingly, we begun to get hung up on the idea of “I have no idea how I could ever forgive someone who did something like that.”  Someone even brought up the story of a woman who had her family murdered by a man who she then turned around and visited in prison every day, bringing him food and spending time with him.  Wow.  It got to the point that the situations were becoming so intense, that we needed to take a step back and focus on the concept of forgiveness itself.  After all, the most effective way to teach a child to ride a bike is not to give them a unicycle.

    Forgiveness, or the act of withholding forgiveness, is, at it’s core, intrinsically linked to pride.  Let me paint a picture that better illustrates this: say you’re cut off on the freeway - willfully, rudely, even dangerously.  For most of us, we will, in time, forgive this other driver, even if we happen to share a few choice words about what we think of them first.  So what can we take away from this?  That we know how to forgive.  It may come quickly, or it may not, but we are familiar with the act of bestowing forgiveness on another.

    If we know how to forgive, then, what is the difference between forgiving one who cut us off, and forgiving one who did something of an infinitely more awful nature?  Pride.  It is because we feel that we have been wronged beyond an acceptable limit, that we hold back forgiveness.  We refuse to grant our offender forgiveness because they did something too egregious, and they should pay, and we’re unwilling to leave judgment up to God because this situation is too extreme, and God might just go easy on them and not give them all that they deserve.

    I wish I could say I have learned this through first-hand experience, and in a sense, I have - I have experienced this pride in myself first-hand.  But I think this serves as a valuable reminder to all of us that the next time we’re unwilling to forgive, the reason is more deeply rooted in our own pride than it is in our offender’s actions.

    *Experiencing that much hurt is not something to take lightly, and if you have, please don’t consider a discussion by those who have not as treating the matter without dignity.  But I believe some quality thoughts on forgiveness came from the talk, and I’d like to share them.

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

  • In Brussels, We Just Call Them Sprouts

    This entry was originally published at GlobalYawning.com

    Always seeking ways to further my skill set in my pursuit of becoming a House/Trophy Husband, I figure I might as well share some tips for all the fellas out there with similar aspirations.  Today’s tip comes in the form of cooking.  Specifically that much maligned veggie, the Brussels Sprout.  Now some of you may not know, but that little mean green delicacy is actually a nutritional heavyweight - 3g of protein and fiber, and a heaping dose of Vitamin C in ~6 of the lil guys.  But, we’re going to negate those effects a little today with what I like to call Campfire Brussels Sprouts, mainly because I discovered this delicious “marinade” while camping (they say necessity is the mother of invention, but I would surmise that surplus is at least the cousin - when you have 8 lbs of peanut butter and two bottles of syrup for 8 people over one weekend, you find ways to use it).

    First, cook up some Brussels sprouts, browning them off in a skillet.  Fresh/raw ones aren’t always available in store, so frozen may have to suffice.  If you go this route, do your best to dry them as much as possible before sauteing them, so the sauce sticks better.  As you can see, these sprouts are what one might traditionally call “charred,” (I had to momentarily leave the kitchen to help a granny cross the street, and then rescue her cat from a burning building tree, so I let them get a little “well done”) but Brussels sprouts are very forgiving for two reasons - 1) If you wanted to, the outer layer comes off easily, and 2) They tend to taste the same whether they’re charred or not, and we won’t be eating them plain anyway.

    "Burnt," you say?

    "Burnt," you say?

    Now that our sprouts are ready, get your peanut butter (I prefer chunky) and your maple syrup (I prefer lite).  Combine equal parts to the point that the PB has a molassas-like consistency; you don’t want it too runny.  Toss it all into a ziplock bag and shake and bake (yes, you helped).

    Try to keep your guests from just eating them out of the bag

    Try to keep your guests from just eating them out of the bag

    And there you have it.  Simple and delish, the ideal combo.  And here is the final meal - turkey burgers and brown rice.  Who says a good meal has to go straight to your hips?

    Wow, this is such an unappetizing plate presentation, sorry. My excuse - I was hungry!

  • Why I’m Intolerant - And You Should Be Too

    This entry was originally published at GlobalYawning.com

    Today, it being election day, GY is bringing you a lesson in the English language. True it isn’t as exciting as a free coffee or donut for voting, but this is more important for now. Our lesson focuses on the following word: Tolerance. Ahhhh how much I despise this word. Mostly because people have no idea what it means, but use it like they do. Let’s start with a definition, as provided by the Merriam Webster online dictionary: “a: sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with one’s own b: the act of allowing something.” Now let’s look at the antonym, intolerance: “a: unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in religious matters b: unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights.” Please do not miss two critical points. First, love is not a synonym for tolerance (closest result: patience), and second, hate is not a synonym for intolerance (closest result: impatience).

    Now, let us apply this to how the words tolerance/intolerance are being used in this election season. We will focus through the lens of homosexual marriage, with CA’s Proposition 8 being the most attention grabbing. Here’s the lowdown: Those who oppose prop 8 are considered intolerant, often labeled bigots, while those who are in favor are considered tolerant. Fair enough - at this point, we have no problem, this is a factually correct statement*. Moving on, what are the ramifications of this? I have experienced (in second hand form) much hatred toward those who support proposition 8; these people expressing hatred claim the prop 8 supporters are awful people, and those who are in favor of homosexual marriage cannot believe how intolerant the supporters of prop 8 are. Here is where we’re hit with the 16 ton safe of irony. Refer back to the definitions we started with: yes, the supporters of proposition 8 are intolerant. But aren’t those who support homosexual marriage intolerant of those who are in favor of prop 8? After all, they do not feel the supporters of prop 8 deserve equal freedom of expression. Wait a second…

    Anyway, not to belabor the point, but it is clear that America is moving towards a position where tolerance is a must, unless it has to do with Christianity, at which point intolerance is not only OK, but often encouraged. I will leave anyone who still believes tolerance is valuable with this quote from C.S. Lewis, which drives home just how weak-willed a call to tolerance is, since it is impossible to truly take a stand on one side of an issue without being intolerant of the opposing views. “And our charity** must be a real and costly love, with deep feeling for the sins in spite of which we love the sinner — no mere tolerance or indulgence which parodies love as flippancy parodies merriment.”***

    Now go get your vote on, and do your best to educate anyone who calls you intolerant of the fact that they are too - welcome to the club!

    *This statement is correct as long as a negative value/connotation is not assigned to the label “bigot,” which is not found in the most base definition: “a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices.” If bigot is used with malice, this statement is no longer guaranteed to be true.

    **Post updated with redefinition of charity as Lewis intended it, rather than charitable donations, etc.

    ***C.S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory

Sunday, 02 November 2008

  • Oh, Sacred Is Sacred, And Secular Is Secular, And Always The Twain Shall Meet

    This entry was originally published at GlobalYawning.com

    As I’ve mentioned recently, I have a desire to see people (including the one in the mirror) experience unity between their work and faith lives, or the sacred and secular, as Tozer would say.  It just so happens that the final chapter of Tozer’s The Pursuit of God focused on that.  Now, this is the second to last Tozer post you’ll be seeing, for the near future at least, so if you’re longing for a change, itsacomin.  There will be this post, and then an overall review.  So without further ado about nothing, let’s dive in.

    “This tends to divide our total life into two departments.  We come unconsciously to recognize two sets of actions.  The first are performed with a feeling of satisfaction and a firm assurance that they are pleasing to God.  These are the sacred acts and they are usually thought to be prayer, Bible reading, hymn singing, church attendance and such other acts as spring directly from faith.  They may be known by the fact that they have no direct relation to this world, and would have no meaning whatever except as faith shows us another world, ‘an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.’
         Over against these sacred acts are the secular ones.  They include all of the ordinary activities of life which we share with the sons and daughters of Adam: eating, sleeping, working, looking after the needs of the body and performing our dull and prosaic duties here on earth.  These we often do reluctantly and with many misgivings, often apologizing to God for what we consider a waste of time and strength.  The upshot of this is that we are uneasy most of the time.  We go about our common tasks with a feeling of deep frustration, telling ourselves pensively that there’s a better day coming when we shall slough off this earthly shell and be bothered no more with the affairs of this world.
         This is the old sacred-secular antithesis.  Most Christians are caught in its trap.  They cannot get a satisfactory adjustment between the claims of the two worlds.  They try to walk the tight rope between two kingdoms and they find no peace in either.  Their strength is reduced, their outlook confused and their joy taken from them.” (118-119)

    “Let us think of a Christian believer in whose life the twin wonders of repentance and the new birth have been wrought.  He is no living according to the will of God as he understand it from the written Word.  Of such a one it may be said that every act of his life is or can be as truly sacred as prayer or baptism of the Lord’s Supper.  To say this is not to bring all acts down to one dead level; it is rather to lift every act up into a living kingdom and turn the whole life into a sacrament.” (121)

    “We can meet this successfully only by the exercise of an aggressive faith.  We must offer all our acts to God and believe that He accepts them.  Then hold firmly to that position and keep insisting that every act of every hour of the day and night be included in the transaction.  Keep reminding God in our times of private prayer that we mean every act of His glory; then supplement those times by a thousand thought-prayers as we go about the job of living. Let us practice the fine art of making every work a priestly ministration.  Let us believe that God is in all our simple deeds and learn to find Him there.” (123)

    I really cut these quotes short to keep the post manageable, but if this topic is of interest to you, the entire chapter is gold.  Anyway, I love Tozer’s analysis of the situation.  The first step is to recognize that the secular activities do not dilute the sacred, but that the sacred elevate the secular.  From there, we go on to being in constant communication with God during all times, and through our thousands of thought-prayers, reminding God (and I believe more importantly, ourselves), that all is for Him.
    I know that I often find myself longing for a position in full time ministry, because I want to make an impact.  But when I am truly living 24/7 for Christ, I am making an impact - there is no duality here, my life is perfect unity.  God is present everywhere, making any task full time ministry.  This is helpful to me as I begin to seek a mission and purpose for the Faculty and Staff Christian Fellowship.  If we see ourselves having our jobs where we do (and simply existing) as a means of bringing Christ into all that we do, and intrinsically linked to that, all who we meet, it becomes clear that the most menial of desk jobs can have great impact.

    I think at times I sound like a broken record with certain topics.  That is usually because I need to convince myself of them.  Yes there is a purpose to my job, even if I feel I’m simply languishing in the backwaters of insignificance for 8 hours a day.  God knows what’s up, and has a plan.  And I’m excited to see how he will use us in FSCF to implement that plan.  So the next time you’re feeling a disconnect between your sacred and secular life, let’s take heart in focusing on bring our sacred life into everything, rather than on how deep and how wide the chasm appears.

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]

DaWhiteDudez

  • Visit DaWhiteDudez's Xanga Site
    • Name: Bach n Joe. Joe n Bach
    • Country: United States
    • State: California
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 6/7/2004

About Me

  • 11/24/82 (Joe) and 2/23/83 (Bach) are two days that have already gone down in the history books.